First up, Jacqui Smith:-
Home Secretary Jacqui Smith has hinted that authorities may be given the right to access your online information from social networking and auction sites.
(Jacqui) Smith says in a speech that websites that offers a free account “are a potential hotbed for terrorist activity”, as the activity on them is not tracked.
She wants the relevant authorities to be able to track potential terrorists’ actions, although only names and locations would be logged, not the content of the message.
Oh yes, that’s one of the problems with the logging of email addresses. Once you get into networking sites (and secure ones at that, it becomes dark. The problem with the government plan is that not all web sites are within your juridiction, and many of those that are outside of it will be in countries that will diplomatically tell you to piss off if you send a request. So, the only people affected are legitimate people.
Then, there’s Andy Burnham:-
Video-sharing websites - such as YouTube - could be forced to carry cinema-style guidance ratings, it has emerged.
Ministers are planning to introduce tough new rules to make websites carry age certificates and warning signs on films featuring sex, violence or strong language.
The Culture Secretary said video clips may soon have to carry ratings such as the ‘U’, ‘PG’, ‘12′ and ‘18′ ones used by cinemas.
Which, is perfectly possible for cinemas because it’s all within your jurisdiction. But enforcing certificates on websites will add a cost to British websites that the rest of the world doesn’t have to meet. A US/Russian company will still be able to show videos without this.
Can someone pop in and see the cabinet, maybe explain how the internet transcends territories?
Tags: Politics, Internet // 4 Comments »